Legal Opinion

Powers v. Scharling

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1907No. 15,249PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Dickinson district court; Oscar L. Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*856The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

David Sibrell executed a will in which was incorporated the following provision:

“I desire and design to, and I do by this paper writing (both a will and a deed), create, convey to, and vest in, my beloved daughter, Harriet Campbell, a present interest and estate in and to all the estate of which I am now or shall be at the time of my death seized, or to which I am now or shall be then entitled, to the extent of one-half thereof, always, however, subject to the payment of the said debts, expenses and legacies heretofore mentioned, and also to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Stewart v. LohrWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Powers v. ScharlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Meddis v. KenneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Coulson v. WingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bank of Denton v. JeschSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. CHELF v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. Lillard v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Thompson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. Poston v. DelfelderWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API