Legal Opinion
Payne v. Department of Commerce
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 29, 1982No. 1294, CA A24178PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
Petitioner seeks reversal of the Employment Relations Board’s (ERB) invalidation of petitioner’s dismissal of its employe, Payne.1 ERB based its decision on its conclusion that petitioner’s pre-termination notice to Payne violated a state personnel rule, Rule 81-605, and that that violation invalidated Payne’s subsequent dismissal. Petitioner contends that ERB erred in three respects: (1) the pre-termination notice was sufficient to comply with the rule; (2) even if the notice was insufficient, any such error on petitioner’s part was cured by the full and fair post-termination hearing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tupper v. FAIRVIEW HOSP. & TRAIN. CENTER, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Oregon State Penitentiary v. Jerry HammerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hammer v. OREGON STATE PEN., CORR. DIVISIONOregon Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Payne v. Department of Commerce, Building Codes DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1883
- Knutzen v. Department of Insurance & FinanceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994