Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

St. Louis County v. S.D.S.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 7, 2000No. C9-99-981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, * Judge.

Respondent was charged with two armed robberies for the benefit of a gang. Appellant St. Louis County appeals from a trial court order denying certification to •adult court. Because the trial court did not place the proper weight on the seriousness of respondent’s alleged crimes and his prior record of delinquency in balancing the factors for certification set forth in Minn.Stat. § 260.125, subd. 2b (1998), we reverse with directions to certify.

FACTS

The state alleges that on January 22, 1999, 17-year-old respondent S.D.S. entered the Dee Independent Cleaners…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Honn v. Coin & Stamp Gallery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. In Re the Welfare of S.J.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. In re the Welfare of K.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of P.C.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In Re the Welfare of L.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In re the Welfare of J.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. In re the Welfare of R.D.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API