Conner v. City of Spencer
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell,- Judges:-..
This is "Á writ of ejfrrir to a'- judgment of the .circrijj; court of Roaiie'Corihty Setting aside a verdict for |300¡d0', in favor of the plaintiff, and áwardirig a new' trial/ ^
The action, 'is for dámages to .a spring on' plaintiff’s^ residential'property abutting'Prospect Street iri the'erty^ of Spencer.' The plaintiff alleges in'his’declaration arid’’ addudes testiriioriy to prove that said spring, ‘ theretofore ’ producing potable water, was ruined ‘ ’in 192-7 by the '• city’s grading and hard-surfacing said street, which' i's ' about'fifteeri or twenty feet distant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blair v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Guinn v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- McHenry v. City of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- Bartlett v. Grasselli Chemical Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
- Keene v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kirk v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
- Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935