Legal Opinion

Conner v. City of Spencer

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1934No. 7711PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell,- Judges:-..

This is "Á writ of ejfrrir to a'- judgment of the .circrijj; court of Roaiie'Corihty Setting aside a verdict for |300¡d0', in favor of the plaintiff, and áwardirig a new' trial/ ^

The action, 'is for dámages to .a spring on' plaintiff’s^ residential'property abutting'Prospect Street iri the'erty^ of Spencer.' The plaintiff alleges in'his’declaration arid’’ addudes testiriioriy to prove that said spring, ‘ theretofore ’ producing potable water, was ruined ‘ ’in 192-7 by the '• city’s grading and hard-surfacing said street, which' i's ' about'fifteeri or twenty feet distant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blair v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Guinn v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. McHenry v. City of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Bartlett v. Grasselli Chemical Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Keene v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API