Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1938No. 8655PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge :

Plaintiff owns a tract of land' below defendant’s railroad. This action is to recover temporary damages to the tract allegedly caused by the manner in which defendant has piped the water from the hills above, under its roadbed onto the tract. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant and entered judgment accordingly.

Defendant purchased its right-of-way from one J. H. Adair who was also a predecessor in title of plaintiff. Defendant pleaded a judgment recovered against it by Adair as res judicata. In support thereof, defendant introduced the pleadings, the judgment and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hargreaves v. KimberlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Fowle v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. McHenry v. City of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Strange v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jenkins v. SpitlerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API