Legal Opinion

Reed v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1953No. 1282PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a charge of unlawfully inviting one Palmisano to accompany him for a lewd and immoral purpose. 1 Palmisano, a police officer, was the sole witness for the Government. He testified that appellant engaged him in conversation in the men’s room of a bus station, said he would talk to witness outside ■and shortly thereafter on the street invited witness to go with him and commit an act of perversion.

At the close of the Government’s case appellant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the grounds (1) that there was a fatal variance between the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Villaroman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Bicksler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. King v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Rosenau v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Jim Pennywell v. Honorable J. L. McCarrey Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  5. City of Seldovia v. LundDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API