Reed v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant was convicted of a charge of unlawfully inviting one Palmisano to accompany him for a lewd and immoral purpose. 1 Palmisano, a police officer, was the sole witness for the Government. He testified that appellant engaged him in conversation in the men’s room of a bus station, said he would talk to witness outside ■and shortly thereafter on the street invited witness to go with him and commit an act of perversion.
At the close of the Government’s case appellant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the grounds (1) that there was a fatal variance between the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Villaroman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Bicksler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- King v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by7 opinions
- Riley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Rosenau v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Jim Pennywell v. Honorable J. L. McCarrey Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- City of Seldovia v. LundDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.