King v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
•CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Again we are called upon to decide whether evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction on a charge that a defendant violated a section of our Code 1 which makes it a crime for any person to invite, entice, persuade any person to accompany, etc., him or her to any place for any immoral or lewd purpose, or to address for any of those purposes.
The conviction in this case followed a trial without a jury, at which was heard the testimony of two police officers, the defendant, and several character witnesses. Reversal is urged primarily on the claim that the trial court did…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Perlich v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Kelly v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- Riley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Konvalinka v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wajer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Bicksler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.