Legal Opinion

(PC) Hicks v. Robles

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 25, 2025No. 1:18-cv-01481Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MICHAEL JAMES HICKS, No. 1:18-cv-01481-KES-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 12 v. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO WITHDRAW FROM HIS SETTLEMENT 13 H. ROBLES, et al., AGREEMENT 14 Defendants. 15 Docs. 139, 146, 155, 161 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Michael James Hicks is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 20 in this closed civil rights case that was brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred 21 to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bright v. Bechtel Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Richman v. HartleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Boston LLC v. JuarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Puritas Laundry Co. v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API