Puritas Laundry Co. v. Green
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Prank R. Willis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover a balance of $431.70, alleged to be due upon a contract. Judgment went for defendant, from which, and an order denying its motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff was engaged in the laundry business and defendant was the recognized owner of what is known as a “driver’s route,” throughout which, with a horse and buggy owned by him, he engaged in collecting and delivering articles for laundering, and when the work was done returned and redelivered the same to the owners thereof. On February 21, 1906, the parties entered into a contract, which was to continue in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dieringer v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by3 opinions
- Perfection Mattress & Spring Co. v. DupreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Stokes v. Dole Nut Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- (PC) Hicks v. RoblesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025