Legal Opinion

Electric Furnace Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Deering Milliken Research Corporation, and Defendant,cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1967No. 17100, 17101PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.

We consider here the appeal of Deering Milliken Research Corporation (Deering) defendant in a libel action, from a judgment for plaintiff, Electric Furnace Corporation (Electric), awarding plaintiff-appellee $834.36 compensatory and $50,000 punitive damages. Judgment was entered after the District Court reduced, as excessive, a jury’s verdict, returned July 30, 1965, for $2,000 compensatory and $60,000 punitive damages.

This judgment was the product of the third trial of this lawsuit. The outcome of the first trial in which a jury awarded $6,420 compensatory and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pollard v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Den Norske Ameriekalinje Actiesselskabet v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Bigelow v. BrumleyOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Fry v. McCord Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cook v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Continental Nut Company v. Robert L. Berner CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  4. Teilhaber Manufacturing Co. v. Unarco Materials StorageColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. McGee v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API