Philpott v. Yeoman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
This is an appeal from a decree entered in a declaratory judgment proceeding brought by two grandchildren of Rosina Bronson, deceased. They are the children of Otto Bronson. Plaintiffs contend that they are pretermitted heirs under the decedent’s will. The trial court concluded otherwise and they appeal.
*500The will of Rosina Bronson was duly admitted to probate in Oregon. No appeal was taken from that -order;; In so far as relevant to this proceeding, that will provides:
“FIRST: I declare that I am a widow and that I have five (5) children living at the date of execution hereof, whose names are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Gerrish v. GerrishOregon Supreme Court · 1880
- Van Strien v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Estate of TalmageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Estate of McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nicholson v. SorensenAlaska Supreme Court · 1973