Legal Opinion
Friends of Animals v. Haugrud
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 21, 2017No. Case No. 1:15-cv-01500 (CRC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
The Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) is authorized to, remove wild horses from public rangeland when it makes a determination that there is an overpopulation. Plaintiff Friends of Animals, a non-profit animal advocacy organization, challenges a July 2015 BLM decision authorizing the removal .of all excess wild horses in Colorado’s West Douglas Herd Area (“WDHA”), “beginning September 14, 2015 with 167 [horses].” A.R. 7964-70 (Decision Record for- the 2015 WDHA Wild Horse Gather and Removal) (“WDHA Decision Record”). That…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Friends of Animals v. Jill SilveyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Friends of Animals v. PendleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Friends of Animals v. U.S. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Friends of Animals v. U.S. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.