Legal Opinion

Hanover Company v. Twisdale

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 31, 1979No. 7813SC970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Defendants first contend that the trial court erred in allowing witnesses for the plaintiff to testify about conversations with U. J. LeBlanc, an agent of defendants. The witnesses testified that negotiations leading to the contract were conducted between them and LeBlanc and that LeBlanc was present on the job site as defendants’ agent. The witnesses testified generally that LeBlanc directed the project and authorized fréquent changes from the written contract. For example, the superintendent for plaintiff testified: “Additional equipment other than that which was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commercial Solvents, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Bailey v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. In Re Will of WilderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Superior Foods, Inc. v. Harris-Teeter Super Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dailey v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Biggers v. EvangelistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Catucci v. LewisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Pet, Inc. v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API