Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 19, 2006No. 2195051PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY G. ELDER, Judge.

Kellup Lamonte Brooks (appellant) appeals from his jury trial conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in admitting the certificates of analysis establishing that some of the substances seized at the time of his arrest on an unrelated offense were cocaine. He argues the certificates contained hearsay considered testimonial under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), and, thus, that admitting them without having the forensic analyst present to testify, although…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hinojos-Mendoza v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Magruder v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  3. State v. BelvinSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. Cypress v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  5. Grant v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API