Legal Opinion
EE Maxwell Co., Inc. v. Arti Decor, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided June 13, 1986No. Civ. A. CA3-86-1414-DPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FITZWATER, District Judge.
In this diversity action removed from state court, defendant, Arti Decor, Ltd. (“Decor”), has applied for a preliminary order to compel the return of certain bathroom hardware held by its former manufacturer’s representative, The E.E. Maxwell Company, Inc. (“Maxwell”), plaintiff. Maxwell has applied for a prejudgment writ of attachment and for a temporary restraining order so that it may retain possession of the subject goods. For the reasons 1 set forth, the court grants in part Maxwell’s application for a prejudgment writ of attachment,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. & Mississippi Public Service Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Miller Brewing Company v. Fort Worth Distributing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Marshall Durbin Farms, Inc. v. National Farmers Organization, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Dreyer v. JaletDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1972
- Hochstadler Bros. v. SamTexas Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Fredeman Litigation. Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. Channel Fueling Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Jones v. BushDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
- In Re Argyll Equities, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- S.R.S. World Wheels, Inc. v. EnlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Brinson v. Park on Bandera ApartmentsDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.