Legal Opinion

Compton, Ault & Co. v. Marshall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1895No. 185PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Third District, in an appeal from McLennan County.

1Opinion of the Court

This was a proceeding for the trial of the right of property in certain goods which were levied upon by virtue of a writ of attachment in favor of plaintiffs in error against Eaton, Guinan Co., as the property of the latter, and which were claimed by the defendant in error. The good at the time of the seizure were in the possession of the claimant. He asserted title to the property under a deed in trust executed by Eaton, Guinan Co., the defendants in the attachment, to him as trustee, for the purpose of securing certain creditors therein named.

In the case of the Bank of California v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Watkins v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Crosby v. HustonTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Tillman v. HellerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hawley v. BullockTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Jewett v. PalmerNew York Court of Chancery · 1823

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. D. Sullivan & Co. v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Atex Const. Co. v. FarrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Canfield v. Bank One, Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  4. Contractors Source, Inc. v. Amegy Bank National Association D/B/A Amegy Bank of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Rogers v. RogersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API