Legal Opinion
Atex Const. Co. v. Farrow
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 11, 1934No. 7948PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, Justice.
Appellees, E. H. Farrow and his wife, Ora Farrow, sued appellants to recover damages for the death of their minor son, alleging that in August, 1927, the appellants, operating under the firm or partnership name of Atex Construction Company, were engaged in constructing a gas line, which work required blasting with dynamite, and for which purposes the appellants kept on hand large quantities- of dynamite caps to be used in the charge and explosion of dynamite for blasting rock out of the ditch in which the gas pipe was placed; that in the course of such work the appellants…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seale. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
- Pitts v. ElslerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Guitar v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Vills v. City of CloquetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. InmonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Smith v. KoenningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Traylor v. BrentzelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Albert Garza and Felicita Garza, Individually and as Next Friend of Their Child, Robert Garza, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Dezendorf Marble Company v. GartmanTexas Supreme Court · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.