Legal Opinion
Ainsworth v. Dunham
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1963PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
The only question presented is whether or not a judgment should be set aside for the reason that the defendant and his attorney had no notice of the trial and were not present at the trial.
ORS 18.160 provides:
“The court may, in its discretion, and upon such terms as may be just, at any time within one year after notice thereof, relieve a party from a judgment, decree, order or other proceeding taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.”
This is an action for attorneys fees in Jackson county. A Coos county firm, from Coos Bay, represented the defendant.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bratt v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Korlann v. BeltonOregon Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Burke v. RachauOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Morrell v. County of LaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Niemela v. CollingsOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.