Legal Opinion

Reardon v. Wood

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

On or about August 27, 1926, plaintiff loaned to the defendant Olympic Theatre Corporation SI,500, and took its promissory note for that amount, dated August 27, 1926, indorsed by the defendants Smith and Wood, payable August 27, 1927, at the Oneida National Bank, Utica, N. Y., with interest at ten per cent. Plaintiff accepted said note and before the due date thereof delivered said note to said bank for collection. On the due date said bank presented it for payment, payment was refused and the note was dishonored for non-payment. On the 29th of August, 1927, the first business day after the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. . CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Germania Life Insurance v. CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. New York Life Insurance v. CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Latham v. SheffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reardon v. Olympic Theatre Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Kings County Trust Co. v. GiovincoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API