Legal Opinion

Reardon v. Olympic Theatre Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Per Curiam. The New York State rule applicable to this case as to the effect upon the rights of sureties, of payment of interest in advance, is quoted from Brandt on Suretyship in the dissenting opinion of Judge Werner in New York Insurance Co. v. Casey (178 N. Y. 381, at p. 388). With this statement all the judges sitting in that ease agreed. The facts and circumstances in the record we are considering — instead of rebutting the prima facie evidence of a contract extending time to pay principal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. . CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Reardon v. WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. East Side Savings Bank v. ScanlonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Eagle Building Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hunt v. ManvilleNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Kings County Trust Co. v. GiovincoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API