Legal Opinion

Clark v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Lucas County Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 3, 2000No. 98-10107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fred J. Shoemaker, Judge.

Plaintiff Bernard Clark asserts a cause of action against defendant for false imprisonment. Defendant denies liability. The court conducted a trial in this matter on the issues of liability and damages. The findings and conclusions herein are derived from the documents and pleadings contained in the case file, the evidence introduced at trial, and the presentations made by the parties.

On April 22, 1997, plaintiff was sentenced to a definite term of ten months for possession of cocaine, under Count One of the indictment in case No. CR 97-03-0542 in the Court of Common…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Corder v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Rainey v. Lorain Correctional FacilityOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trice v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr., 07ap-828 (3-25-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API