Nicholas v. McDaniel
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.
William and Caroline Nicholas (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs) appeal from a declaratory judgment and permanent injunctive order dismissing the Nicholas claim for trespass against Russell McDaniel and Richard Rademacher (hereinafter referred to as defendants), declaring Burgess Creek to be navigable, and prohibiting plaintiffs from obstructing free passage through same.
The facts relevant to the disposition of this appeal are as follows. Burgess Lake has no inlet and only the outlet of Burgess Creek. The latter is approximately 800 feet long and empties into a 35-acre body of water…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Giddings v. RogalewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- City of Grand Rapids v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Winans v. WillettsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Attorney General Ex Rel. Director of Conservation v. TaggartMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Pigorsh v. FahnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Allegan Prosecutor v. Summer School of Painting at Saugatuck, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- State ex rel Allegan Prosecutor v. Summer School of Painting at Saugatuck, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982