Legal Opinion

Pappas v. Bowen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 8, 1988No. 230, Docket 88-6139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MINER, Circuit Judge:

The Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Korman, J.) remanding plaintiffs’ action to the Secretary with specific instructions for calculation of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406 (1982). The Secretary had determined that plaintiffs Pappas and Stehr were entitled to retroactive benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433 (1982), and Title XVI of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Bowen v. GalbreathSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Sidney E. Dawson v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Martha M. BURNETT, Appellee, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Binder & Binder, P.C. v. Handel (In Re Handel)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Sam MAZZA, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES of the United States, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Pappas v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Mara v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. In re: Melinda HandeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API