Legal Opinion

Sam MAZZA, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES of the United States, Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 25, 1990No. 89-5601PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

The claimant here filed concurrent claims for Social Security Disability and Supplemental Security Income payments. Asserting that a statutory amendment granted an option, the Social Security Administration calculated the disability benefits first and offset them against potential SSI payments, despite a long-standing practice to the contrary. As a result, the claimant was denied entitlement to SSI benefits and the accompanying entitlement to Medicaid. We conclude that the agency’s unguided, random processing of the concurrent claims here was arbitrary…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Blackwell Health Center for Women v. KnollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Sacred Heart Medical Center v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Conoco, Inc. v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Delaware River & Bay Authority v. KopaczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Dauphin County Industrial Development Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API