Legal Opinion

State v. Ospina

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 30, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

239 N.J. Super. 645 (1990)

571 A.2d 1373

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

RUBEN DARIO OSPINA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted February 14, 1990.

Decided March 30, 1990.

Before Judges DEIGHAN, R.S. COHEN and VILLANUEVA.

Thomas S. Smith, Jr., Acting Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Capitola Young, Designated Counsel, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Ospina submitted a pro se supplemental brief.

Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Marijean Raffetto Stevens, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BeaversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. State v. MautiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  3. State v. BaluchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. State v. TerryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  5. State v. OspinaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API