Legal Opinion

In re Shear

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 13, 1911No. 3,963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of proceedings against Wilson M. Shear. On motion to punish for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZED, District Judge.

Referee Hamlin has certified to me as judge of the court of bankruptcy, pursuant to section 41 of the bankrupt act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 556 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3437J), that tlie bankrupt, after taking the prescribed oath, refused to be examined according to law, in that on the examination before him he gave willful, evasive, and false testimony, and that he was guilty of contempt of court for refusing to be examined according to law. The asserted false oath was made during the course of the examination of the bankrupt (section 7, subd. 9), and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. In re FellermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906
  3. In re GitkinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. In re SchulmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1909
  5. Ex parte BickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. DachisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  2. In re DavoliDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. In re EskayDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
  4. In re ShearDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API