Hillis v. Kessinger
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered September 15, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Appellants assign the following grounds of error: (1) The court erred in refusing to instruct a verdict for the appellants; (2) the court erred in denying appellants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict; (3) the court erred in denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. In argument, it is stated by appellants that all the evidence covering these assignments of error is so intermingled that they can best be discussed together.
*16It is claimed that the only evidence introduced by the respondents in support of their allegations of conspiracy, misrepresentations, and fraud was that of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wales v. NewbouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Carver v. LouthainIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Forsyth v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Paich v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Thornton v. Britton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patterson v. CushmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- DePee v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Olson v. Ottertail Power Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Hershiser v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.