Legal Opinion

Town of Janesville v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.

It appears without dispute that the town road involved in this action had been in existence and was used as a highway for public travel since the year 1843. In 1857 defendant’s predecessor in interest acquired in the town of Janesville a one hundred thirty feet wide right of way which crossed the town road by cutting a deep cut through the road; and defendant’s predecessor restored the road to such condition that its usefulness was not materially impaired by building a bridge over its railway tracks so that the travel on the road passed above the railroad traffic. Defendant s predecessor, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Benson v. MayorNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Kendrick & Roberts, Inc. v. Warren Bros.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Town of Jamestown v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. City of Oshkosh v. Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Louisville & N. R. v. United States Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Metro. Sew. Dist. v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & P. RR.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Metropolitan Sewerage District ex rel. Sewerage Commission v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API