Legal Opinion

Lynn v. Overlook Development

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1990No. 8928SC732PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

We note at the outset that plaintiffs have abandoned their challenge to that portion of the trial court’s order allowing defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages against the City of Asheville and J.R. Smith in his official capacity. We further note that plaintiffs, beyond a bare restatement of their assignment of error, did not present argument in the brief in support of their challenge to the trial court’s dismissal of their claim for injunctive relief against the Mayor and City Council of Asheville. This challenge is therefore deemed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Dixon v. StuartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Wiggins v. City of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Martin v. MondieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wood v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lynn v. Overlook DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Fabrikant v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Inspirational Network, Inc. v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API