Legal Opinion

Field v. Burr

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1900No. L.A. No. 650PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a judgment for intervenor in a suit for the recovery of personal property levied upon by defendant, as sheriff, under attachment in favor of plaintiff against third party.

The findings are unusually full and explicit, but in the conclusions of law the word "plaintiff" is inadvertently used for "intervenor," which is the ground urged for reversal. (Doughertyv. Ward, 89 Cal. 81.)

We recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

Gray, C., and Haynes, C., concurred.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed.

McFarland, J., Temple, J., Henshaw, J.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dougherty v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Camacho v. BalasquideSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
  2. Cummings v. Columbia Pictures Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Camacho v. BalasquideSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913