Legal Opinion
City and County of Honolulu v. Cavness
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1961No. 4216PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*233OPINION OP THE COURT BY
LEWIS, J.
This is an appeal by a defendant who, by decree of the trial court in an action brought by the City and County of Honolulu, hereinafter called the “City,” has been required to demolish and remove his building, situate at the corner of Smith and North Pauahi Streets, Honolulu.
Specification of error No. 3 asserts that: “The trial court erred in finding that the building of appellant was a public nuisance and that it could only be abated by demolition and destruction.” We first consider the attack upon the finding of a public nuisance. Upon review of the evidence,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- City of Houston v. LurieTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- New York Trap Rock Corp. v. Town of ClarkstownNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- State v. PaulineHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Marsland v. PangHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
- Jarvis v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- City and County of Honolulu v. CavnessHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.