Legal Opinion

City and County of Honolulu v. Cavness

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1961No. 4216Published

1Opinion of the Court

364 P.2d 646 (1961)

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a Municipal Corporation, by Ralph S. INOUYE, Its Building Superintendent, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Orestus CAVNESS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 4216.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

August 15, 1961.

James A. King, Honolulu (Bouslog & Symonds, Honolulu, on the briefs), for defendant-appellant.

David H. C. Lee, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Honolulu (Norman K. Chung, Corp. Counsel, and Henry H. Shigekane, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Honolulu, on the briefs) for plaintiff-appellee.

Before TSUKIYAMA, C. J., and CASSIDY, WIRTZ, LEWIS, and MIZUHA, JJ.

LEWIS, Justice.

This is an appeal…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. City of Georgetown v. THE ALEXANDRIA CANAL COMPANY, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. City of Houston v. LurieTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. New York Trap Rock Corp. v. Town of ClarkstownNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API