Legal Opinion

Armstead v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1905No. 3024PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the theft of a hog, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary:

It is insisted the court erred in not only failing to charge the law applicable to a case of circumstantial evidence, but also in refusing to give a requested instruction submitting this theory of the law. This is a case of circumstantial evidence. The son of the alleged owner testi fled that he found appellant Merl Armstead and John Coffee in possession of a dead hog on Sunday evening; which he subsequently identified as one that belonged to his father Dan…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Silvas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Lafell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. La Fell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Villareal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API