Legal Opinion

Middleton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1919No. 5471Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

on rehearing.

February 4, 1920.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

—Appellant’s able motion for rehearing urges a number of interesting questions, first among them being the insistence that the charge of the trial court on principals was erroneous, and that we should have so held.

Our Procedure in this State requires, under certain statutory directions, that the charge of the court be excepted to in due time, so that the supposed errors which are pointed out may be corrected, and the cost and delays of appeals be lessened; failure to so except is held to cure all errors in the charge not fundamental. Examining…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Criner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Silvas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. McAlister v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API