Legal Opinion
Eichaker v. Village of Vicksburg
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 8, 2015No. Case No. 1:12-CV-1350Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
This action alleging discrimination and retaliation because of military service is before the Court on Plaintiff David Eic-haker’s motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 67) and on Defendant *621Village of Vicksburg’s motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 69.) For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs motion will be denied and Defendant’s motion will be granted.
I
Plaintiff David E. Eichaker was hired by Defendant Village of Vicksburg (“the Village”) as a part-time police officer in May 1999. In October 1999 he was hired as a full-time police officer.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Sheila White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.