Legal Opinion

De Leo v. Bertucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court,.Nassau County (Levitt, J.), entered October 1, 1982, which denied his motion to vacate a default judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. While recent amendments to the CPLR have empowered the courts to exercise their discretion to excuse defaults resulting from law office failure (CPLR 2005, 3012; L 1983, ch 318), the amendments by no means guarantee that a default will be excused in all cases. On this record, defendant’s conduct demonstrated a lengthy and deliberate pattern of delay…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. De Vito v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Buderwitz v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Grosso v. HauckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Seeman v. SeemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Zolov v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API