Portman v. American Home Products Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves to compel answers to questions propounded to defendant on oral examination, Rule 37(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. and to compel production of all written statements taken by defendant of witnesses.
Plaintiff claims that in February, 1944 he was engaged by defendant to assist in the acquisition of concerns in the veterinary serum field. He alleges that through his efforts defendant was able to obtain all the stock of the Fort Dodge Serum Company, and that despite due demand the latter has failed and neglected to compensate plaintiff for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Corbett v. Columbia Transp. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1946
- Rockett v. John J. Casale, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- Galambus v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1974
- Humphries v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
- Diniero v. United States Lines Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.