Legal Opinion

Drayton v. McIntyre

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 2023No. 1:23-cv-01308Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KAPRI DRAYTON, : Plaintiff : : No. 1:23-cv-1308 v. : : (Judge Rambo) AMANDA MCINTYRE, et al., : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Kapri Drayton initiated the above-captioned pro se action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971), alleging a host of constitutional violations by 17 different federal officials. Drayton improperly attempts to assert multiple, unrelated causes of action against diverse defendants in a single complaint. Additionally, because many of his…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API