Legal Opinion

People v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated March 26, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly determined that he was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. Thus, he was properly designated a level three sex offender (see People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 128-129 [2011]; People v Bowden, 88 AD3d 972, 973 [2011]; People v…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. BowdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. MondoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. LivingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API