Legal Opinion

Zamoyski v. Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 4, 2011No. Civil Action 08-30125-KPNPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFFS-IN-CO UNTERCLAIM’S MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES (Document No. 87)

NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to section 505 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505, Fifty Six Hope Road Music, Ltd., Zion Rootswear, LLC, and Bob Marley Music, Inc. (“Marley Parties”), as Plaintiffs-in-Counterclaim, seek fees and costs post-trial from Jürek Zamoyski (“Zamoyski”), as Defendant-in-Counterclaim. Zamoyski has not only opposed the Marley Parties’ motion but, in turn, has requested the opportunity to submit his own motion for fees should the court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Assessment Technologies of Wi, LLC v. Wiredata, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.M.B.H. & Co. Kg.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Matthews v. FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. v. Lessard Design, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  2. Fair Housing Justice Center, Inc. v. Goldfarb Properties, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  3. Imposter Pastor Movie, LLC v. OliverDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
  4. Todd Conley v. Daniel S. Vacanti, et al.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API