Zamoyski v. Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFFS-IN-CO UNTERCLAIM’S MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES (Document No. 87)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to section 505 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505, Fifty Six Hope Road Music, Ltd., Zion Rootswear, LLC, and Bob Marley Music, Inc. (“Marley Parties”), as Plaintiffs-in-Counterclaim, seek fees and costs post-trial from Jürek Zamoyski (“Zamoyski”), as Defendant-in-Counterclaim. Zamoyski has not only opposed the Marley Parties’ motion but, in turn, has requested the opportunity to submit his own motion for fees should the court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Assessment Technologies of Wi, LLC v. Wiredata, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.M.B.H. & Co. Kg.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Yardley v. Houghton Mifflin Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Matthews v. FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Humphreys & Partners Architects, L.P. v. Lessard Design, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Fair Housing Justice Center, Inc. v. Goldfarb Properties, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Imposter Pastor Movie, LLC v. OliverDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Todd Conley v. Daniel S. Vacanti, et al.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2026