Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Moody v. Daggett

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 15, 1976No. 74-6632PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

429 U.S. 78 (1976)

MOODY

v.

DAGGETT.

No. 74-6632.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 12, 1976.

Decided November 15, 1976.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.

Phylis Skloot Bamberger, by appointment of the Court, 425 U. S. 932, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Frank H. Easterbrook argued the cause for respondent pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Thornburgh, Jerome M. Feit, and George S. Kopp.[*]

2Opinion of the Court · BurgerChief Justice Burger

We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether a federal parolee imprisoned for a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. (PC) Beckett v. BanaagDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. (PC) Guevara v. Superior Court County of San MateoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (PC) Hayde v. ZamoraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (PC) Jones v. California Medical FacilityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (PC) Lipsey v. Hand-RongaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API