Legal Opinion

Tucker Taxi, Inc. v. Schofield

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 2, 1958No. A-315PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STURGIS, Chief Judge.

Tucker Taxi, Inc., an employer, and Maryland Casualty Company, its insurance carrier under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., the petitioners, bring this proceeding in certio-rari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission which reversed an order of a Deputy Commissioner denying *190dependency benefits to the widow and children of Ernest Joe Schofield, deceased, claiming under the Act.

Schofield was employed as a taxicab driver by Tucker Taxi, Inc. On the Saturday of his death a fellow-employee and superior, one McNally, became informed that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Florida Forest & Park Service v. Eston StricklandSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Fischer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Vollmer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Armstead, Widow, Etc. v. Sommer, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carnegie v. Pan American LinenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. 391st Bomb Group v. RobbinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Spleen v. Rogers Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Sterling v. Mike Brown, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. City of Miami v. GranlundSupreme Court of Florida · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API