Tucker Taxi, Inc. v. Schofield
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STURGIS, Chief Judge.
Tucker Taxi, Inc., an employer, and Maryland Casualty Company, its insurance carrier under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., the petitioners, bring this proceeding in certio-rari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission which reversed an order of a Deputy Commissioner denying *190dependency benefits to the widow and children of Ernest Joe Schofield, deceased, claiming under the Act.
Schofield was employed as a taxicab driver by Tucker Taxi, Inc. On the Saturday of his death a fellow-employee and superior, one McNally, became informed that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Florida Forest & Park Service v. Eston StricklandSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Fischer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- Vollmer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Armstead, Widow, Etc. v. Sommer, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carnegie v. Pan American LinenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- 391st Bomb Group v. RobbinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Spleen v. Rogers Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Sterling v. Mike Brown, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- City of Miami v. GranlundSupreme Court of Florida · 1963