Maxwell v. Saylor
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Me. Justice Allen M. Stearne:
I dissent from the majority opinion. This decision is contrary to reason and is unsupported by legal authority. A married man and a woman (not his wife) acquired title, as husband and wife, as “tenants by the entireties”. Such seisin was not effective because the parties were not in fact husband and wife. I do not agree that under the guise of construing the deed this Court may decree a supposed intention contrary to that expressed. Such interpretation rests upon the supposed theory that because tenancy by the entireties has an attribute of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Beihl v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Gasner v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Cochrane's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.