Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maxwell v. Saylor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1948No. Appeal, 58Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Allen M. Stearne:

I dissent from the majority opinion. This decision is contrary to reason and is unsupported by legal authority. A married man and a woman (not his wife) acquired title, as husband and wife, as “tenants by the entireties”. Such seisin was not effective because the parties were not in fact husband and wife. I do not agree that under the guise of construing the deed this Court may decree a supposed intention contrary to that expressed. Such interpretation rests upon the supposed theory that because tenancy by the entireties has an attribute of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Beihl v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Gasner v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Cochrane's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API