Legal Opinion
Bastianson v. Forschen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 27, 1972No. 43811PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
These two cases, consolidated for purposes of trial in the district court as well as being consolidated for appeal, have been here before. Bastianson v. Forschen, 293 Minn. 31, 196 N. W. 2d 451 (1972). This court affirmed in part and remanded for an adjustment of damages awarded to Orlando Bastianson, the surviving husband of Bertha Bastianson, the decedent.
At the trial, issues were submitted to the jury by special verdict in the form of special written findings upon all issues of ultimate fact, including damages, pursuant to Rule 49.01, Rules of Civil Procedure. The jury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Majerus v. GuelsowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- McCormack Ex Rel. McCormack v. Hankscraft Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Bastianson v. ForschenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Integrity Mut. Ins. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Westbrook State Bank v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Steady State Imaging, LLC v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023