Legal Opinion
Curtik v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 24, 1937No. 5057PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This petition is brought by the administrator of the estate of Victoria Curtik, the person named as beneficiary in the two policies of yearly renewable term insurance, issued to Joseph J. Curtik, a World War veteran. Defendant has moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the petitioner “is not a party in interest and is not a person claiming under contract of insurance within the meaning of the World War Veterans’ Act as amended [38 U.S.C.A. § 421 et seq.].”
The motion was submitted on papers taken from the case folder, from which the following facts appear to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. WorleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Singleton v. CheekSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Dowell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- McCullough v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gambill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1938
- Kane v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939