Legal Opinion

Martin v. Grace Line, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 8, 1970No. Civ. No. S-988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MacBRIDE, District Judge.

This action for personal injuries was brought by a seaman who was injured while a crew member of the SS

Rutgers Victory. He brought his action under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 688). Realizing too late that the ship is owned by the United States rather than Grace Line, plaintiff concedes, as he must, that his remedy should be under the Suits in Admiralty Act (46 U.S.C. §§ 741-52 & 781-90). See Cosmopolitan Shipping Company v. McAllister, 337 U.S. 783, 69 S.Ct. 1317, 93 L.Ed. 1692 (1949); Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet Corp.,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Edward C. Carter v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. Kruhmin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  5. Cabales ex rel. Cabales v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelsen v. Research Corp. of the University of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1991
  2. T. J. Falgout Boats, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972
  3. Kindrew v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1972
  4. Steudler v. ALASKA STEAMSHIP COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API