Diddams v. Empire Milking Machine Co. Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover the value of 12 cows alleged to have been electrocuted because of defendant’s negligence in the faulty installation of an electrically operated milking machine in plaintiff’s barn. The facts, not really in dispute, may be thus stated:
Defendant manufactures and sells milking machines to local dealers selected by it in this state. Of late those driven by electric current are made and disposed of, besides those run by other power such…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosebrock v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Alexander v. Nanticoke Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Mangan's Admr. v. Louisville Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Griffith v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1900
- Alton Railway & Illuminating Co. v. FouldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First National Bank v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Carlson v. FredsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949