Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bush v. Gore

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 12, 2000No. 00-949Published

1Dissent

Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Stevens and Justice Ginsburg join except as to Part I-A-1, and with whom join except as to Part Justice Souter joins as to Part I,

dissenting.

The Court was wrong to take this case. It was wrong to grant a stay. It should now vacate that stay and permit the Florida Supreme Court to decide whether the recount should resume.

I

The political implications of this case for the country are momentous. But the federal legal questions presented, with one exception, are insubstantial.

*145A

1

The majority raises three equal protection problems with the Florida Supreme Court’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Gore v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. In re Election of the United States Representative for the Second Congressional DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API