Legal Opinion
In re Election of the United States Representative for the Second Congressional District
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 16, 1994No. 15134PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This is an action brought pursuant to General Statutes § 9-3231 by Edward W. Munster and *605Sam Gejdenson, in separate petitions, each challenging the results of the election canvass and recanvass (election) for the office of the United States Representative for the Second Congressional District of Connecticut (district).2 Munster was the candidate of the Republican Party, and Gejdenson was the candidate of *606the Democratic Party. Accordingly, their names appeared on all ballots prepared for and used in the election.
The election was held on November 8,1994.3 Because, the results of the canvass of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hurlbut v. LemelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Donovan v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Wrinn v. DunleavySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Moran v. BensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- State ex rel. Andrew v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bortner v. Town of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Gonzalez v. SurgeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Appeal of McDonoughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.