Manchel v. Weil
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ROBINSON, Judge:
This is an appeal from the order of the court below sustaining preliminary objections to a complaint in assumpsit on the ground the court lacked jurisdiction over the person of defendant.
The defendant, Weil, appellee herein, a resident of Illinois prior to January of 1977, made a telephone call to plaintiff, Manchel, appellant herein, a resident of Pennsylvania, to his place of business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and consum mated an oral agreement for the rental of a villa which appellant owned in Acapulco, Mexico. Among the terms of the rental agreement, was the condition…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- In-Flight Devices Corporation v. Van Dusen Air, Incorporated, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Action Industries, Inc. v. WiedemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hart v. McCollumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scoggins v. ScogginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Schmitt v. Seaspray-Sharkline, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fuller Co. v. Valley Consolidated Industries, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1984
- Levin v. Kirschner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1981